A Code Discovered or Invented?

Published Wednesday 2nd May, 2007 by Skrik

Stone cubes in Rosslyn Chapel
If you’ve ever read Thomas Pynchon’s Crying of Lot 49, you’ll understand that we humans attribute significance in the most unlikely of things, and have a tendency to give meaning to the essentially meaningless. I wonder if that is what Thomas Mitchell and son have done with some of the carvings in the Rosslyn Chapel. (Yes, it’s the chapel at the end of The DaVinci Code, which has since garnered a lot of interest from various different directions.)

Their technique involves interpreting the carvings as representative of the patterns produced on Chladni plates. The music sounds fine (.mp3) - contemporary with the period of the carvings, even. But I have my doubts that the music is in fact encoded in the masonry.

Cymatics, the study of waves, didn’t exist before the end of the eighteenth century, when Ernst Chladni published his groundbreaking work with sound tables. Could the masons who carved the chapel have had knowledge of something Chladni is now considered to have pioneered? The crux of the matter is whether or not Chladni plates existed in the late mediæval period, when the chapel was built. If they did, why was knowledge of them lost for a couple of hundred years? If not, however, then why should the carvings signify what we recognise as Chladni patterns? In such a case, the Mitchells’ work would resemble the work of protagonist Oedipa Maas in Pynchon’s novel.

Filed under Humanities, Literature, Weblogging

Comments (0)

Comments RSS - Trackback - Write Comment

No comments yet

Write Comment

You have to be logged in to write a comment.